Rats, Moles and Wasps Pest Control review

On the evidence, possibly for its three named pests: it holds a five-star Google rating, though from only a handful of ratings, and its page confirms its scope. Public evidence is thin overall, so read the full page and its sources. Message the listed number for a price. A tight scope suits a caller who knows the pest already.

Industry qualifications can't be sourced for this firm from the registers, its page or the platforms checked. That scores as insufficient evidence rather than a failing. Weigh the customer record and the paperwork you are given, and ask for training detail in writing. No mandatory registration applies to pest controllers, so this gap reflects a thin file.

It publishes no prices, call-out fees or quote terms. That means your enquiry does the talking: describe the pest and ask for the full price including any return visit. Ask whether a call-out fee applies on top. Confirm the price before work starts. With only a social media page behind it, the written reply to your enquiry is the only price worth comparing.

The trader is based at Market Drayton, north of Telford, and takes on rats, moles and wasps. The scope stops at those three pests, plainly stated. Nearby villages sit closest to its patch. Send your postcode with the enquiry to confirm you are covered. Telford itself sits in the stated service area, but confirm the visit for your postcode.

It was researched for our September round but sits outside the top ten, so it carries no ranked position. Thin public evidence keeps it out rather than poor feedback. If that changes, the next round can reassess it. Read the full review, then ask for the price in writing. New evidence can put it back in the frame.

No rates, call-out fee or quote terms appear anywhere, and the only web presence is a social media page. Start from the number on its map listing and say which of the three pests you have and where. Ask for one total covering any return visit, since nothing is published. Keep the reply with your records for comparison.

The file holds a five-star Google rating from only a handful of ratings, perfect as far as it goes. That is the whole customer record: no wider platform ratings sit alongside it. The social media page states the scope rather than adding reviews. Treat the rating as a promising start that needs more voices behind it.

The ranked ten all show thicker files, with most running their own websites and several stating insurance or fixed prices. This trader sits outside that table because it publishes no insurance detail, prices or trading history. Against the ranked rural cover it offers a narrower scope with a plain name. Compare its written quote with ranked rivals on identical scope.